Pro Athletes Tweet About Politics At Their Own Risk


Democracy in action: Protestors at the state capitol in Madison, Wisconsin.

The political situation unfolding in Wisconsin is a powder keg of emotions, and I’m trying not to be swept up by it all.

Friends, family and co-workers will tell you, my calm demeanor is one of my finest assets. I wouldn’t have survived my years in a TV newsroom or as a magazine editor without a thick skin and calming presence.

But certain things hit close to home, strike nerves and get me to break my vow to seldom talk politics on Facebook and Twitter. As a former public employee in my home state of Iowa, I feel for what’s happening to neighbors in my adopted state of Wisconsin. I’ve been there when budgets were cut. I’ve felt their pain. This is deeply personal.

For pro atheletes, that’s a little harder sell. 

Jumping into this – or any – political fight is risky business to say the least. It’s easier – and perhaps wiser – to stay out of it. Opinions are fine, but when pro athletes voice them publicly – especially on Twitter or Facebook – it’s a whole different animal.

Green Bay Packers defensive star Charles Woodson was one of the few to take sides in the debate between Wisconsin’s public-sector unions and its newly-elected Republican governor, Scott Walker. Woodson has sided with the unions, which is not a surprise, given his kinship with Wisconsinites. He might also be banking some goodwill when debate shifts to the NFL’s collective bargaining agreement.

What was surprising was Floridian Paul Azinger’s snarky tweets about the Wisconsin budget battle. I’m a casual Azinger fan when he’s on the golf course. I admired his recovery from cancer and his Ryder Cup leadership. He seems like a nice guy.

I know now that I don’t want to hear what he has to say about politics in Wisconsin. At all. Ever. Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk summed it up perfectly:

“When we want a fix of politics, we each know where to find it. When we want to get away from that crap (and, in many cases, it is indeed crap), we turn to sports.”

Recently, I challenged Tiger Woods to step up his Twitter game. But it was to talk a lot more about golf, life and the challenges of his comeback. I want the volume to increase, but I don’t want to hear what Tiger has to say about health care or the deficit.

Mr. Azinger is entitled to his opinion. He’s free to share it on Twitter or Facebook or wherever. I simply contend he is wrong, mostly because he lacks perspective: He doesn’t live in Wisconsin. He’s never been a public employee. 

I let him know so on Twitter:

A zinger for Azinger.

We actually had some interesting back-and-forth in subsequent tweets, and Mr. Azinger even DM’d me a couple times. (If he would only follow me back, I could respond there, too … wink-wink, Zinger.) I commend him for engaging fans (and non-fans).

I don’t deny his right to share his views on this issue. I’d just rather hear his views on Tiger Woods. Or the whacky world golf rankings. Or even pimp his new GolfPlan app. I’m getting that from his stream, too, which is why I’m still following him.

For now.

Sure, I could get nasty and talk specifically about Mr. Azinger’s politics, the current state of his golf career or his personal life. There’s no need for that. I simply believe he’s wrong about what’s happening in Wisconsin, and that as a professional athlete, tweeting about it repeatedly is probably not what his fans want to see.

Quite simply, he has a lot more to risk with those opinions than I do.

Thanks for being a fan.